Monthly Review Dergisi\u2019nden \u00c7eviren: Erman \u00c7ete<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Siyasal \u0130ktisat.com web sitesinden al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201c<\/em><\/strong>K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck burjuva, s\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fccadelesinden korkar ve onu mant\u0131ksal sonucuna ve ana hedefine ta\u015f\u0131maz.\u201d Lenin <\/em><\/strong>[*]<\/strong><\/a> D\u00f6nek Kautsky Eserinden <\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Gabriel Rockhill’in 1 Haziran 2023 tarihinde Monthly Review<\/em> dergisinde yay\u0131nlanan “1968 D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi Miti ve Frans\u0131z Entelijansiyas\u0131: Tarihsel Meta Feti\u015fizmi ve \u0130deolojik Gerileme” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 Erman \u00c7ete siyasaliktisat.com<\/em><\/a> i\u00e7in \u00e7evirdi. Yaz\u0131y\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7 par\u00e7a halinde yay\u0131nlayaca\u011f\u0131z. “1968\u2019in Diyalektik Bir Analizi” ve “\u0130dealist Analoji” ba\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan Birincik\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 “Tarihsel Meta Feti\u015fizmi” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 ikinci k\u0131s\u0131m takip edecek. Son 3. k\u0131s\u0131m “Sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 Sebeplerle Kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmak” ve “Fikirlerin Uluslararas\u0131 Siyasal \u0130ktisad\u0131: Ele\u015ftirinin Sol S\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 Kontrol Etmek” ba\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yaz\u0131n\u0131n orijinaline <\/strong>https:\/\/monthlyreview.org\/2023\/06\/01\/the-myth-of-1968-thought-and-the-french-intelligentsia-historical-commodity-fetishism-and-ideological-rollback\/<\/strong><\/a> <\/strong><\/a>adresinden<\/strong><\/a> ula\u015fabilirsiniz.<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1- 1968\u2019in Diyalektik Bir Analizi<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cOlaylar, tarihin ger\u00e7ek diyalekti\u011fidir.<\/em>\u201dAntonio Gramsci[1]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Her b\u00fcy\u00fck toplumsal ve siyasi hareket gibi, May\u0131s 1968 olaylar\u0131 diye an\u0131lan olaylar\u0131n da bir\u00e7ok farkl\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fc ve i\u00e7 \u00e7eli\u015fkileri vard\u0131r. Tek bir anlam \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde kolayca \u00f6zetlenemezler ve farkl\u0131 gruplar\u0131n iktidar i\u00e7in yar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, farkl\u0131 y\u00f6nlere itti\u011fi ve \u00e7ekti\u011fi s\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fccadelelerinin alan\u0131 olmu\u015flard\u0131r. Bu durum ge\u00e7mi\u015f i\u00e7in oldu\u011fu kadar bug\u00fcn i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir, zira tarihsel anlam \u00fczerindeki m\u00fccadele olay\u0131n kendisi ge\u00e7tikten \u00e7ok sonra da devam eder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201868\u2019e diyalektik yakla\u015f\u0131m, olaylar\u0131n sonsuz karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmekle ba\u015flar ve ayn\u0131 zamanda temel \u00f6zelliklerinden baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 anlamland\u0131ran sezgisel bir \u00e7er\u00e7eve olu\u015fturmak i\u00e7in onlardan somut olarak soyutlan\u0131r. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7eve daha y\u00fcksek ya da al\u00e7ak bir soyutlama seviyesinde konumland\u0131r\u0131labilir, bu da \u00e7ok katmanl\u0131 bir analize, yani olay\u0131 en makro seviyesinde ele alabilen ya da mikro geli\u015fmelere odaklanabilen bir analize olanak tan\u0131r. Elbette b\u00f6yle bir analizin i\u015fleyebilmesi i\u00e7in farkl\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7ekler aras\u0131nda tutarl\u0131 bir ili\u015fki olmas\u0131 gerekir, b\u00f6ylece \u00f6l\u00e7ekler i\u00e7 i\u00e7e ge\u00e7ebilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda, spesifik bir unsura ge\u00e7meden \u00f6nce genel \u00e7er\u00e7eveyi k\u0131saca \u00f6zetleyece\u011fim: Frans\u0131z entelijansiyas\u0131n\u0131n rol\u00fc ve daha spesifik olarak Frans\u0131z teorisi<\/em> olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan \u015fey. Fransa\u2019daki \u201868 ayaklanmalar\u0131nda en az iki b\u00fcy\u00fck g\u00fc\u00e7 i\u015f ba\u015f\u0131ndayd\u0131. Bir yanda, k\u0131smen sava\u015f sonras\u0131 geni\u015fleyen orta s\u0131n\u0131f tabakas\u0131 ve h\u0131zla artan \u00f6\u011frenci n\u00fcfusu taraf\u0131ndan y\u00f6nlendirilen baby-boom ku\u015fa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n gen\u00e7lik ve \u00f6\u011frenci hareketi vard\u0131. Bu hareket b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde d\u00fczen kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 bir ethos ile karakterize ediliyordu ve Michel Clouscard\u2019\u0131n \u2018transgresif liberteryenizm\u2019 (bazen Daniel Cohn-Bendit gibi a\u00e7\u0131k antikom\u00fcnizm ile sorunsuz bir \u015fekilde birle\u015fiyordu) olarak adland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feyle doluydu. \u00d6te yandan, Avrupa tarihindeki en b\u00fcy\u00fck greve ve i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 i\u00e7in elle tutulur kazan\u0131mlara yol a\u00e7an b\u00fcy\u00fck bir i\u015f\u00e7i seferberli\u011fi vard\u0131.[2]<\/a> Birincisi, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck\u00e7\u00fc ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrelci y\u00f6nelimleri de dahil olmak \u00fczere b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde Yeni Sol\u2019a ba\u011fl\u0131yken, ikincisi bazen eme\u011fin sermayeye kar\u015f\u0131 m\u00fccadelesinin Eski Sol politikalar\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.[3]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Burjuva tarihi, \u201868\u2019den her \u015feyden \u00f6nce Paris\u2019in g\u00f6be\u011findeki \u00f6\u011frencilerin \u00f6nderli\u011findeki isyanlar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc muhafaza etmi\u015ftir: Latin Mahallesi\u2019ndeki barikatlar, Sorbonne\u2019un i\u015fgali, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck\u00e7\u00fc sloganlar vs. Entelijansiyan\u0131n \u00f6nemli bir kesimi, \u00f6zellikle de anar\u015fist, Maoist, Tro\u00e7kist, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck\u00e7\u00fc sosyalist ve Marksist ak\u0131mlar, bu isyanlar\u0131 destekleyen yaz\u0131lar yazd\u0131lar ve s\u0131k s\u0131k sokaklarda ve \u00e7e\u015fitli i\u015fgallerde onlara kat\u0131ld\u0131lar. Marksist-Leninist entelekt\u00fceller genel olarak, go\u015fist<\/em> olmakla ve devrimci bir duruma olan hayali inanca ba\u011fl\u0131 olmakla ele\u015ftirdikleri, sesi daha g\u00fcr \u00e7\u0131kan \u00f6\u011frencilerin \u00e7o\u011funun \u00f6rg\u00fcts\u00fcz k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck burjuva ve antikom\u00fcnist politikalar\u0131n\u0131n stratejik netli\u011fini sorgulad\u0131lar.[4]<\/a> Ayn\u0131 zamanda, bu entelekt\u00fcellerin \u00e7o\u011fu gen\u00e7lik ayaklanmas\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fccadelesinin yeni bir a\u015famas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6nemli bir kataliz\u00f6r olarak kabul ettiler ve i\u015f\u00e7ilerin seferber edilmesini kararl\u0131l\u0131kla desteklediler.<\/p>\n\n\n\n G\u00f6rece\u011fimiz gibi, entelijansiyan\u0131n bu farkl\u0131 kesimleri, Frans\u0131z teorisi olarak bilinen fenomene b\u00fcy\u00fck katk\u0131larda bulunanlar olarak k\u00fcresel \u00e7apta \u00f6ne \u00e7\u0131kanlar de\u011fildi.[5]<\/a> Aksine, \u201868 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrleri olarak pazarlananlar \u2013Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Jacques Lacan, Pierre Bourdieu ve di\u011ferleri\u2013 tarihsel i\u015f\u00e7i hareketinden kopuk ve \u00e7o\u011fu zaman bu hareketi k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcmseyen ki\u015filerdi. Ayn\u0131 zamanda \u00f6\u011frenci hareketine de d\u00fc\u015fmanca ya da en az\u0131ndan olduk\u00e7a \u015f\u00fcpheci yakla\u015f\u0131yorlard\u0131. Her iki anlamda da \u201868 kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrler ya da en az\u0131ndan g\u00f6sterilere \u015f\u00fcpheyle yakla\u015fan teorisyenlerdi. Onlar\u0131 \u201868\u2019in radikal teorisyenleri olarak pazarlayan k\u00fcresel teori end\u00fcstrisi taraf\u0131ndan te\u015fvik edilmeleri, bu tarihsel ger\u00e7e\u011fi b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00f6r\u00fcnmez hale getirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n TAMAMINI OKUMAK \u0130\u00c7\u0130N \u0130ND\u0130R\u0130N\u0130Z<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Gabriel Rockhill: 1968 D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi Miti ve Frans\u0131z Entelijansiyas\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1-2 ve 3 Haziran 2023 Monthly Review Dergisi\u2019nden \u00c7eviren: Erman \u00c7ete Siyasal \u0130ktisat.com web sitesinden al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r \u201cK\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck burjuva, s\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fccadelesinden korkar ve onu mant\u0131ksal sonucuna ve ana hedefine ta\u015f\u0131maz.\u201d Lenin [*] D\u00f6nek Kautsky Eserinden Gabriel Rockhill’in 1 Haziran 2023 tarihinde Monthly Review dergisinde yay\u0131nlanan “1968 D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dunya-sosyalizmi","category-kapitalizm"],"blocksy_meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4274"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4274\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4275,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4274\/revisions\/4275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/sosyalistbirlik.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/sipahioglu_096-1024x664.webp\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n