{"id":5543,"date":"2025-05-29T12:08:28","date_gmt":"2025-05-29T12:08:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/?p=5543"},"modified":"2025-11-04T18:46:23","modified_gmt":"2025-11-04T18:46:23","slug":"sol-kemalist-oportunizmi-kavrayalim-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/?p=5543","title":{"rendered":"Sol Kemalist Oport\u00fcnizmi Kavrayal\u0131m (2)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Sol Kemalist Oport\u00fcnizmi Kavrayal\u0131m (2)<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Mehmet Ulusoy’un “T\u00fcrkiye’ye \u00d6zg\u00fc Sosyalizm” G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Onur \u015eahin, May\u0131s 2025<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz g\u00fcnlerde ilk par\u00e7as\u0131 yay\u0131mlanan yaz\u0131 dizimize devam ediyoruz. Sol-Kemalist Oport\u00fcnizmin ete kemi\u011fe b\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcp “T\u00fcrkiye’ye \u00f6zg\u00fc sosyalizm” diye g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir sabaha uyand\u0131k yine!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00d6ncelikle en ba\u015ftan belirtelim: Marksizmin yerelle\u015ftirilmesi savundu\u011fumuz ve destekledi\u011fimiz bir yakla\u015f\u0131md\u0131r. Nitekim Nepalli Marksist yolda\u015flar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n Marksizmi nas\u0131l kendi \u00fclkelerinin \u00f6zg\u00fcn ko\u015fullar\u0131na uygulad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fim ve bu olumlu yakla\u015f\u0131mlardan \u00f6rnek alma \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m “Marksizmin Yerelle\u015ftirilmesi ve Pra\u00e7anda Yolu” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 yaz\u0131m Bilim ve Sosyalizm<\/em> dergisinde yay\u0131mlanal\u0131 birka\u00e7 y\u0131l oluyor. Mehmet Ulusoy da bu derginin kadrosundayd\u0131. Bu k\u0131sa maziyi hat\u0131rlatarak kimi okurlar\u0131n kap\u0131labilece\u011fi yanl\u0131\u015f alg\u0131y\u0131 k\u0131rma gere\u011fi duydum. Ha bir de \u015funu tekrar hat\u0131rlayal\u0131m ki oport\u00fcnizm zannedilenin aksine bir k\u00fcf\u00fcr ya da hakaret de\u011fil bir te\u015fhistir. S\u00f6z konusu sol-Kemalist oport\u00fcnizm anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 Mao Zedung’un me\u015fhur “hastay\u0131 kurtarmak i\u00e7in hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 tedavi etmeli” \u015fiar\u0131ndan yola \u00e7\u0131karak ele al\u0131nacakt\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla konunun ba\u015fka yerlere \u00e7ekilmesinin de \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fc kapatal\u0131m ve konuya d\u00f6nelim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mehmet Ulusoy yarinlar.com.tr’deki yaz\u0131s\u0131nda \u015f\u00f6yle diyor: “Sosyalistlerin, devrimcilerin 1960\u2019lardan bu yana 60 y\u0131ll\u0131k teorik ve pratik deneyiminin, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin, T\u00fcrk Devriminin \u00f6zg\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yakalama a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, bug\u00fcn bir \u00f6zetini \u00e7\u0131karmak istersek, en \u00f6nemli ger\u00e7ek nedir? Bu ger\u00e7ek, ABD g\u00fcd\u00fcml\u00fc orta\u00e7a\u011fc\u0131 mafya-tarikat g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin kar\u015f\u0131devrim iktidar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, Kurtulu\u015f Sava\u015f\u0131 ve Cumhuriyet Devriminin kazan\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 korumada en ba\u015fta Kemalist ve sosyalistlerin ayn\u0131 m\u00fccadele cephesinde birle\u015fmeleri de\u011fil mi? Solun makus talihini yenmesinin, solun ergenekondan \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131n anahtar\u0131 buradad\u0131r.”<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00d6ncelikle yazar\u0131n halen Perin\u00e7ek’in say\u0131s\u0131z tahrifat\u0131na dayanarak \u015fekillenen ayd\u0131nl\u0131k\u00e7\u0131 demokratik devrim anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n etkisinde oldu\u011funu g\u00f6rebiliyoruz. Bu \u00e7evre neredeyse son otuz y\u0131ld\u0131r eski demokratik devrim-yeni demokratik devrim ayr\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmezden gelerek veya zaman zaman (daha \u00f6nceki yaz\u0131lar\u0131m\u0131zda bizzat Perin\u00e7ek’in kitaplar\u0131ndan \u00f6rnekler verdi\u011fimiz \u00fczere) a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce tembelli\u011fine teslim olarak kendilerine has bir demokratik devrim tahayy\u00fcl\u00fcnde \u00e7ak\u0131l\u0131 kald\u0131. Bizim demokratik devrimden anlad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z \u015fey temelde s\u00f6m\u00fcrge, yar\u0131 s\u00f6m\u00fcrge ve\/veya yar\u0131 feodal \u00fclkelerdeki anti-emperyalist ve anti-oligar\u015fik devrimlerdir. \u00d6nderli\u011finin s\u0131n\u0131fsal karakteri ve i\u00e7inde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00e7a\u011f—kapitalizmden sosyalizme ge\u00e7i\u015f \u00e7a\u011f\u0131—bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da eski ve yeni demokratik devrimler olmak \u00fczere ikiye ayr\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kemalist devrimin dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kuvvet temelde askeri b\u00fcrokratik z\u00fcmre (Hikmet K\u0131v\u0131lc\u0131ml\u0131’n\u0131n deyimiyle Osmanl\u0131’dan beri devleti fiilen y\u00f6neten s\u0131n\u0131f-\u00fcl devlet—devlet s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131), b\u00fcy\u00fck toprak sahipleri, toprak a\u011falar\u0131 ve e\u015fraf\u0131n me\u015fhur “zade” s\u00fclaleleridir. Devrimden sonra bu kesimlerin devrime sa\u011flad\u0131klar\u0131 deste\u011fin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 fazlas\u0131yla ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve art\u0131k ad\u0131m ad\u0131m alelade birer e\u015fraf par\u00e7as\u0131 de\u011fil de insanlara “ekmek kap\u0131s\u0131 sa\u011flayan” sayg\u0131de\u011fer i\u015f adamlar\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcklerini g\u00f6r\u00fcyoruz. Zaten durum b\u00f6yleyken bu insanlar\u0131n birer proleter gibi hareket edip yeni tipte bir demokratik devrime ad\u0131m atacaklar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmek yanl\u0131\u015f olurdu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marksizmin en temel ABC\u2019sinden yola \u00e7\u0131karak bu yal\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi kavrad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131zda Ayd\u0131nl\u0131k\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n hayal ettikleri “Kemalist devrimi tamamlayarak ad\u0131m ad\u0131m sosyalizmi in\u015fa etme” form\u00fcl\u00fcn\u00fcn koflu\u011fu kendili\u011finden ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yazara sorular\u0131m:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rusya ve \u00c7in gibi imparatorluk miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 \u00fclkelerde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen demokratik devrimler ulusal sorunu nas\u0131l \u00e7\u00f6zm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr? Herkesi Rusla\u015ft\u0131rarak, Hanla\u015ft\u0131rarak m\u0131? \u00dclkedeki en kalabal\u0131k etnik grubun dilini ve etnik\/milli-sembollerini \u00fclkedeki az\u0131nl\u0131k etnik gruplara s\u00fcng\u00fcyle dayatarak m\u0131? Bu \u00fclkelerde zaman zaman bu y\u00f6nde olumsuz pratikler hayata ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f olsa bile bu pratikler bu \u00fclkelerdeki ulusal sorunlar\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik Marksist programlar\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131 m\u0131 olu\u015fturmu\u015ftur?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sovyetler Birli\u011fi’nde veya \u00c7in’de demokratik devrim sonras\u0131 devlet eliyle bir gecede zengin olup sonra bu partilerin otoritelerini y\u0131km\u0131\u015f veya bu partileri ele ge\u00e7irmi\u015f “sayg\u0131de\u011fer i\u015f adamlar\u0131” ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f m\u0131d\u0131r? Sovyetler Birli\u011fi’ndeki geri d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f prati\u011fi ak\u0131llara gelebilir. Halbuki Sovyetler Birli\u011fi’ndeki geri d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn destek\u00e7isi olan kesim “sayg\u0131de\u011fer i\u015f adamlar\u0131” de\u011fil kapitalist yolcular veya “Nomenklatura” olarak da bilinen b\u00fcrokratik elittir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u015eimdi bir de konuyu tersten ele alal\u0131m. “Kemalist devrimi tamamlamak” diyorlar. K\u00fcrt milletinin asimilasyonu s\u00fcreci mi tamamlanacakt\u0131r? Devlet eliyle yeni yeni “Pa\u015fazade”ler mi peydahlanacakt\u0131r? K\u00f6yl\u00fc aya\u011f\u0131na \u00e7ar\u0131k bulamazken pa\u015falar\u0131n\u0131 saraylara k\u00f6\u015fklere hapsedip etraf\u0131na t\u00fcneyen ve gece g\u00fcnd\u00fcz \u00c7ankaya’da zevk-\u00fc sefa eden dalkavuk tak\u0131mlar\u0131 m\u0131 canland\u0131r\u0131lacakt\u0131r?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ha yok, “Kemalist devrimi tamamlamak” derken kastedilen \u015fey tam ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve ger\u00e7ekten demokratik T\u00fcrkiye’yi in\u015fa etmek ise onun yolu T\u00fcrk b\u00fcy\u00fck ulus \u015fovenizminden veya yerli ve milli kan emicilerimizi “it de olsa bizim ittir” mant\u0131\u011f\u0131yla g\u00fczellemekten de\u011fil Marksizm-Leninizm’in evrensel akidelerini T\u00fcrkiye’nin \u00f6zg\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekli\u011fiyle birle\u015ftirmekten ge\u00e7mektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Zaten yazar da ac\u0131 ac\u0131 sormaktad\u0131r:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“(…)gelinen noktada b\u00fct\u00fcn toplumsal ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel ko\u015fullar olu\u015ftu\u011fu halde, neden T\u00fcrkiye i\u00e7in en acil, en hayati sorun olan, en ba\u015fta Kemalist ve Sosyalistlerin ortak iradesine dayanan, siyasal ve \u00f6rg\u00fctsel bir m\u00fccadele cephesi olu\u015fmuyor?”<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck burjuva ayd\u0131nlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n fantezilerindekinin aksine T\u00fcrkiye’de 1960 y\u0131l\u0131nda bile her iki ki\u015fiden biri okuma yazma bile bilmiyordu. \u0130lk \u00e7ok partili se\u00e7ime de\u011fin se\u00e7imlere kat\u0131l\u0131m oran\u0131 %10-15 gibi komik oranlar\u0131ndan ibarettir. K\u00f6yl\u00fc kendisine “vekalet eden” vekillerin ad\u0131n\u0131 okuyup yazmay\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131n, bilmemekteydi bile! Meclise b\u00fcnyesinden se\u00e7ildikleri \u015fehirlere hayatlar\u0131nda ad\u0131m dahi atmam\u0131\u015f “milletvekilleri” bu ayd\u0131nlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n fantezilerinde adeta ellerinde ka\u011f\u0131t kalem k\u00f6yl\u00fcn\u00fcn pe\u015finden ko\u015fan idealist birer k\u00f6y \u00f6\u011fretmenidir! Durum b\u00f6yleyken bu ayd\u0131nlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n “Sosyalistler ile ortak irade koyabilecek Kemalist kitleler” s\u00f6ylemleri de g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda hareketi CHP’nin kuyru\u011funa ba\u011flamaktan ba\u015fka hi\u00e7bir i\u015fe yaramayan ve hi\u00e7bir somut ger\u00e7ekli\u011fe dayanmayan s\u00f6ylemlerdir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 19 May\u0131s’ta, 29 Ekim’de ve hatta 10 Kas\u0131m’da y\u00fcr\u00fcyen gen\u00e7lerin ezici \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu “Kemalist” olmay\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131n, ger\u00e7ek Kemal’i bile tan\u0131mazlar. Bir avu\u00e7 Zafer Partili fa\u015fisti hari\u00e7 tutarak s\u00f6yl\u00fcyorum ki bu gen\u00e7ler temelde bask\u0131 ve asimilasyona dayanan Kemalist milliyet\u00e7ili\u011fin aksine masum yurtseverlik duygular\u0131yla ve h\u00fck\u00fcmetin \u00f6zellikle laik kitleleri a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lama \u00e7abalar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 liberal bir tepki olarak y\u00fcr\u00fcmektedirler.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

100 y\u0131ll\u0131k bir ki\u015fi k\u00fclt\u00fc, devletin her bireye en az\u0131ndan 12 y\u0131ll\u0131k zorunlu e\u011fitim hayat\u0131 boyunca y\u00fczlerce saat durmadan tekrarlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 “sar\u0131 sa\u00e7l\u0131 mavi g\u00f6zl\u00fc dev” menk\u0131beleri ve T\u00dcS\u0130AD\/CHP ekseninin say\u0131s\u0131z besleme “cesur” yazarlarla birlikte d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde bu gen\u00e7lerin medya ve sosyal medyada manip\u00fclasyonlarla imal edilen bu yeni Kemal’i sembol edinmelerinde \u015fa\u015f\u0131lacak hi\u00e7bir \u015fey yoktur. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu kitleleri Kemalizm \u015fablonuna hapsederek kazanmay\u0131 ummak veya bir avu\u00e7 dinozor Kemalist ayd\u0131n\u0131 bug\u00fcn hala “ittifak edilecek kuvvetler” olarak de\u011ferlendirmek Mao\u2019nun hakikati olgular\u0131n ard\u0131nda arama ilkesine yak\u0131\u015fm\u0131yor…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sol Kemalist Oport\u00fcnizmi Kavrayal\u0131m (2) Mehmet Ulusoy’un “T\u00fcrkiye’ye \u00d6zg\u00fc Sosyalizm” G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc Onur \u015eahin, May\u0131s 2025 Ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz g\u00fcnlerde ilk par\u00e7as\u0131 yay\u0131mlanan yaz\u0131 dizimize devam ediyoruz. Sol-Kemalist Oport\u00fcnizmin ete kemi\u011fe b\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcp “T\u00fcrkiye’ye \u00f6zg\u00fc sosyalizm” diye g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir sabaha uyand\u0131k yine! \u00d6ncelikle en ba\u015ftan belirtelim: Marksizmin yerelle\u015ftirilmesi savundu\u011fumuz ve destekledi\u011fimiz bir yakla\u015f\u0131md\u0131r. Nitekim Nepalli Marksist yolda\u015flar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n Marksizmi nas\u0131l […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5543","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-arsiv-tr","category-arsiv"],"blocksy_meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5543","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5543"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5543\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5925,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5543\/revisions\/5925"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marksizm.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}